Whats pulling your RPod |
Post Reply | Page <1 1617181920 40> |
Author | ||
wallawallaron
Senior Member Joined: 14 Aug 2011 Location: Walla Walla WA Status: Offline Points: 286 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
^ + 1 Well said.
|
||
WWRon,2012 RP177 HRE "Eye Pod",2010 Ford F-150 4x4
9/11 Never Forget. NRA Life Member, Amsoil dealer www.lubedealer.com/wallawallaron |
||
this_is_nascar
Senior Member Joined: 29 Dec 2009 Location: NJ Status: Offline Points: 366 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
No Ford Ranger ever built had a 7000-lb towing capacity. The most it had, I believe, is 6500-lbs.
|
||
"Ray & Connie"
- 2017 R-Pod RP-180 - 2007 Toyota Tacoma TRD-Off Road |
||
furpod
Senior Member Joined: 24 Jul 2011 Location: Kentucky Status: Offline Points: 966 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
http://www.ehow.com/facts_7621469_1997-ford-ranger-towing-capacity.html
|
||
pentachris
Senior Member Joined: 11 Jul 2010 Location: Alabama Status: Offline Points: 114 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I'm home with the manual now, and I was wrong on more than just that. The max listed for any '97 Ranger is 6000 lbs trailer, 9500 lbs GCWR, 50 ft^2 max frontal area. There are 62, not 40, different configurations listed for the '97 Ranger, showing their various towing capacities. My configuration lists a max of 1500 lbs trailer, 5000 GCWR, with a max frontal area equal to the frontal area of the truck. (The same configuration with an auto tranny is 2400 lbs, 6000 lbs & 50 ft^2 - I think they're mainly worried you're going to burn up the clutch). Again, I have a 4L 6cyl engine. And I was correct - both configurations of 2.3L 4cyl engines with auto trannies have a higher trailer rating (2000 lbs or 2300 lbs depending on whether you have the regular edition or the "Splash" edition). Things may have changed with the Ranger since '97. I'd be surprised if they hadn't. Point is, look past the engine size when you're looking to tow.
|
||
iamsmonk
Groupie Joined: 21 Nov 2010 Location: North Carolina Status: Offline Points: 56 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I had a '98 Ranger, 4.0 V6, 5 speed maunal transmission. I could pull our 177 but would not attempt any moderate to major inclines. Too much of a struggle and slows down too much to suit me. 4 weeks ago I traded the Ranger for a 2004 Dodge Dakota with a 4.7 V8, auto trans. Our first trip pulling the pod will be this weekend and I'm sure I will be pleased with the upgrade. I now have the capabilities of the F-150 with the size closer to my Ranger (which I dearly loved). If I were you, I would re-consider using the Ranger as your tow vehicle unless you are going to stick to mostly flat terrain. This isn't just my opinion, it's experience from a former Ranger owner.
|
||
Sherrie & Carol,
Henri, Tanner & Jay 2004 Dodge Dakota w/4.7 V8 2011 r-pod 177 www.smonk.net Let's go camping! |
||
Richard b
Newbie Joined: 31 May 2011 Status: Offline Points: 8 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Just completed our first trip with the 2011 181-G pulled by our Volvo XC60 (2011). 57 days, 8000 miles through the four Canadian Maritime Provinces - 4 ferry crossings, including to fantastic Newfoundland for 3 weeks.
The Volvo has 300 hp, and a trailer stability computer-control module that with the E2 hitch and weight-distribution bars made pulling a dream, even on rough roads. The volvo radar-adjusted cruise control worked to keep us at 57 mph or slower behind traffic, smoothly shifting through the six gears up and down 2500 foot climbs on Cape Breton and over 3000 miles of Newfoundland adventures, from ice-bergs to moose. Sometimes I did not have to touch gas or brake for over 100 miles - as the computer/radar did it all, even on the trailer. A dream tow package with the Tekonsha wireless prodigy unit that solved the problem of fussy European cars not liking electric brake wiring. Up to 4 days of dry-camping with the large water capacity, dual batteries (even using furnace), and lots of fridge use was easy, with BBQ salmon, or haddock and fresh lobster for dinner, followed by DVDs on TV to unwind, all on battery. With electric hook-ups we baked lots of fresh breakfast bread in the convention oven using local blueberries and partridge berries - yummm! Gas mileage fell from 23 to 13.5 for the 8000 miles but was more than made up for by the lack of hotel bills and big dinner tabs for mediocre food and slow service. What a trip! For anyone interested there are lots of r-pod and travel pics on my blog: richardbumgarner.blogstpot.com which displays uTube linked pics and captions as well. After we clean up a bit we will be off again!!!
|
||
wallawallaron
Senior Member Joined: 14 Aug 2011 Location: Walla Walla WA Status: Offline Points: 286 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Thanks for sharing. Sounds like a great adventure. Can you post a link to see your pictures?
WWR
|
||
WWRon,2012 RP177 HRE "Eye Pod",2010 Ford F-150 4x4
9/11 Never Forget. NRA Life Member, Amsoil dealer www.lubedealer.com/wallawallaron |
||
NorCalCouple
Newbie Joined: 14 Aug 2011 Location: San Francisco Status: Offline Points: 3 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee 3.6L V6
|
||
wallawallaron
Senior Member Joined: 14 Aug 2011 Location: Walla Walla WA Status: Offline Points: 286 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
^ Nice looking set up.
Welcome to the farm. WWR
|
||
WWRon,2012 RP177 HRE "Eye Pod",2010 Ford F-150 4x4
9/11 Never Forget. NRA Life Member, Amsoil dealer www.lubedealer.com/wallawallaron |
||
kymooses
Moderator Group Joined: 27 Jul 2010 Location: Louisville, Ky Status: Offline Points: 1048 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I agree, very nice looking. I am in love with the new shapes of the Grand Cherokees now. I want a new Jeep!!!
|
||
Post Reply | Page <1 1617181920 40> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |